Urine Test Results for DUI Suspects Admissible at Trial
In December 2010 the Minnesota Court of Appeals ruled that the results of urine tests to determine the alcohol in a driver’s urine are admissible at trial. This is a huge victory for prosecutors trying alcohol related cases statewide.
Unfortunately the results of these tests may not be completely accurate. Experts have said that if a person has not recently voided their urine, that the urine can collect and pool in the bladder and thus give an inaccurate report of the body’s alcohol content. This could result in a person’s urine test showing higher alcohol levels than their actual blood alcohol level. These false test results could cause some people to be wrongfully convicted of a DUI when their actual Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) is below the legal limit.
Hopefully this case will go to the Minnesota Supreme Court and they will decide that because these urine test results are not generally accepted as accurate in the scientific community, that they should also not be accepted as accurate in the courtroom. But until this day comes anyone charged with a DUI needs a skilled and experienced criminal defense attorney. If you need someone to help you navigate the confusing legal challenges that come with being charged with a DUI, then contact Cotter Law Offices. Attorney Patrick Cotter has successfully tried numerous DUI cases. Call today for a free initial consultation: 612-436-3050 (office), 651-214-8624 (cell).

